View In:
ArcGIS JavaScript
ArcGIS Online Map Viewer
ArcGIS Earth
ArcGIS Pro
Service Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Idaho wetland condition ranking based on classification of finwetlandwt1 layer into 5 categories: 1 = minimally disturbed (top 1% of wetlands, values 0 – 141); wetlands with absence or near absence of human disturbances; zero to few stressors present; land use almost completely not human-created; equivalent to reference condition; conservation priority; 2 = lightly disturbed (2 - 5%, values 142 – 703); wetland deviates from the minimally disturbed class based on existing landscape impacts; few stressors present; majority of land use is not human-created; these are the best wetlands in areas where some human impacts are present; ecosystem processes and functions are within natural ranges of variation found in the reference condition, but threats exist; usually reference condition; conservation priority; 3 = moderately disturbed (6 - 15%, values 704 – 2,108); several stressors present; land use roughly split between human-created and non-human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are impaired and somewhat outside the range of variation found in the reference condition, but are still intact; ecosystem processes are restorable; sometimes the best remaining wetlands in watersheds with many human impacts; conservation and/or restoration priority; 4 = severely disturbed (16 - 40%, values 2,109 – 5,625); numerous stressors present; land use is majority human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are severely altered or disrupted and outside the range of variation found in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are restorable, but may require large investments of energy and money to succeed; potential restoration priority; 5 = completely disturbed (bottom 41 - 100%, values 5,626 – 14,055); many stressors present; land use is nearly completely human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are disrupted and outside the range of variation in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are very difficult or not feasible to restore. </SPAN></P><P><A href="https://fishandgame.idaho.gov:443/ifwis/conservationplanner/src/docs/Final%20Applications%20of%20Landscape%20Assessment%20Tool%20Report.pdf" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Idaho’s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool—Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning</SPAN></A></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-size:10pt">SUGGESTED CITATION</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-size:10pt">Murphy, C., J. Miller, and A. Schmidt. 2012. Idaho’s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool—Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning. Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Wetland Program Development Grant # CD96072201-0. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Bureau, Habitat Section and Wildlife Diversity Program, and Information Systems Bureau, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Information System. 53 pp. plus appendix</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Map Name: Wetland Condition and Occurrence
Legend
All Layers and Tables
Dynamic Legend
Dynamic All Layers
Layers:
Description: Idaho wetland condition ranking based on classification of finwetlandwt1 layer into 5 categories: 1 = minimally disturbed (top 1% of wetlands, values 0 – 141); wetlands with absence or near absence of human disturbances; zero to few stressors present; land use almost completely not human-created; equivalent to reference condition; conservation priority; 2 = lightly disturbed (2 - 5%, values 142 – 703); wetland deviates from the minimally disturbed class based on existing landscape impacts; few stressors present; majority of land use is not human-created; these are the best wetlands in areas where some human impacts are present; ecosystem processes and functions are within natural ranges of variation found in the reference condition, but threats exist; usually reference condition; conservation priority; 3 = moderately disturbed (6 - 15%, values 704 – 2,108); several stressors present; land use roughly split between human-created and non-human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are impaired and somewhat outside the range of variation found in the reference condition, but are still intact; ecosystem processes are restorable; sometimes the best remaining wetlands in watersheds with many human impacts; conservation and/or restoration priority; 4 = severely disturbed (16 - 40%, values 2,109 – 5,625); numerous stressors present; land use is majority human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are severely altered or disrupted and outside the range of variation found in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are restorable, but may require large investments of energy and money to succeed; potential restoration priority; 5 = completely disturbed (bottom 41 - 100%, values 5,626 – 14,055); many stressors present; land use is nearly completely human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are disrupted and outside the range of variation in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are very difficult or not feasible to restore.
Idaho’s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool—Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning
SUGGESTED CITATION
Murphy, C., J. Miller, and A. Schmidt. 2012. Idaho’s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool—Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning. Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Wetland Program Development Grant # CD96072201-0. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Bureau, Habitat Section and Wildlife Diversity Program, and Information Systems Bureau, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Information System. 53 pp. plus appendix
2a7d2cdeda92435c817fe2dc3ff5ed58
Copyright Text: Idaho Fish and Game, EPA Wetland Program Development Grant # CD - 96072201-0
Spatial Reference:
102100
(3857)
LatestVCSWkid(0)
Single Fused Map Cache: false
Initial Extent:
XMin: -1.2267957566651655E7
YMin: 5462475.191543539
XMax: -1.2177194157212233E7
YMax: 5540205.4254539525
Spatial Reference: 102100
(3857)
LatestVCSWkid(0)
Full Extent:
XMin: -1.3638919924801078E7
YMin: 5010480.011843433
XMax: -1.1762809924801078E7
YMax: 6385740.011843433
Spatial Reference: 102100
(3857)
LatestVCSWkid(0)
Units: esriMeters
Supported Image Format Types: PNG32,PNG24,PNG,JPG,DIB,TIFF,EMF,PS,PDF,GIF,SVG,SVGZ,BMP
Document Info:
Title: Wetland Condition and Occurrence
Author:
Comments: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Idaho wetland condition ranking based on classification of finwetlandwt1 layer into 5 categories: 1 = minimally disturbed (top 1% of wetlands, values 0 – 141); wetlands with absence or near absence of human disturbances; zero to few stressors present; land use almost completely not human-created; equivalent to reference condition; conservation priority; 2 = lightly disturbed (2 - 5%, values 142 – 703); wetland deviates from the minimally disturbed class based on existing landscape impacts; few stressors present; majority of land use is not human-created; these are the best wetlands in areas where some human impacts are present; ecosystem processes and functions are within natural ranges of variation found in the reference condition, but threats exist; usually reference condition; conservation priority; 3 = moderately disturbed (6 - 15%, values 704 – 2,108); several stressors present; land use roughly split between human-created and non-human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are impaired and somewhat outside the range of variation found in the reference condition, but are still intact; ecosystem processes are restorable; sometimes the best remaining wetlands in watersheds with many human impacts; conservation and/or restoration priority; 4 = severely disturbed (16 - 40%, values 2,109 – 5,625); numerous stressors present; land use is majority human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are severely altered or disrupted and outside the range of variation found in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are restorable, but may require large investments of energy and money to succeed; potential restoration priority; 5 = completely disturbed (bottom 41 - 100%, values 5,626 – 14,055); many stressors present; land use is nearly completely human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are disrupted and outside the range of variation in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are very difficult or not feasible to restore. </SPAN></P><P><A href="https://fishandgame.idaho.gov:443/ifwis/conservationplanner/src/docs/Final%20Applications%20of%20Landscape%20Assessment%20Tool%20Report.pdf" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>Idaho’s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool—Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning</SPAN></A></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-size:10pt">SUGGESTED CITATION</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-size:10pt">Murphy, C., J. Miller, and A. Schmidt. 2012. Idaho’s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool—Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning. Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Wetland Program Development Grant # CD96072201-0. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Bureau, Habitat Section and Wildlife Diversity Program, and Information Systems Bureau, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Information System. 53 pp. plus appendix</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Subject: Contains conservation site and wetland inventory project layers with wetland prioritization, condition, and potential occurrence.
Category:
Keywords: idfg,wetland,conservation,prioritization
AntialiasingMode: Fast
TextAntialiasingMode: Force
Supports Dynamic Layers: true
Resampling: false
MaxRecordCount: 2000
MaxImageHeight: 4096
MaxImageWidth: 4096
Supported Query Formats: JSON, geoJSON, PBF
Supports Query Data Elements: true
Min Scale: 0
Max Scale: 0
Supports Datum Transformation: true
Child Resources:
Info
Dynamic Layer
Supported Operations:
Export Map
Identify
QueryLegends
QueryDomains
Find
Return Updates