{ "currentVersion": 11.2, "cimVersion": "3.2.0", "serviceDescription": "

Idaho wetland condition ranking based on classification of finwetlandwt1 layer into 5 categories: 1 = minimally disturbed (top 1% of wetlands, values 0 \u2013 141); wetlands with absence or near absence of human disturbances; zero to few stressors present; land use almost completely not human-created; equivalent to reference condition; conservation priority; 2 = lightly disturbed (2 - 5%, values 142 \u2013 703); wetland deviates from the minimally disturbed class based on existing landscape impacts; few stressors present; majority of land use is not human-created; these are the best wetlands in areas where some human impacts are present; ecosystem processes and functions are within natural ranges of variation found in the reference condition, but threats exist; usually reference condition; conservation priority; 3 = moderately disturbed (6 - 15%, values 704 \u2013 2,108); several stressors present; land use roughly split between human-created and non-human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are impaired and somewhat outside the range of variation found in the reference condition, but are still intact; ecosystem processes are restorable; sometimes the best remaining wetlands in watersheds with many human impacts; conservation and/or restoration priority; 4 = severely disturbed (16 - 40%, values 2,109 \u2013 5,625); numerous stressors present; land use is majority human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are severely altered or disrupted and outside the range of variation found in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are restorable, but may require large investments of energy and money to succeed; potential restoration priority; 5 = completely disturbed (bottom 41 - 100%, values 5,626 \u2013 14,055); many stressors present; land use is nearly completely human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are disrupted and outside the range of variation in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are very difficult or not feasible to restore. <\/SPAN><\/P>

Idaho\u2019s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool\u2014Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning<\/SPAN><\/A><\/P>

SUGGESTED CITATION<\/SPAN><\/P>

Murphy, C., J. Miller, and A. Schmidt. 2012. Idaho\u2019s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool\u2014Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning. Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Wetland Program Development Grant # CD96072201-0. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Bureau, Habitat Section and Wildlife Diversity Program, and Information Systems Bureau, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Information System. 53 pp. plus appendix<\/SPAN><\/P><\/DIV><\/DIV><\/DIV>", "mapName": "Wetland Condition and Occurrence", "description": "

Idaho wetland condition ranking based on classification of finwetlandwt1 layer into 5 categories: 1 = minimally disturbed (top 1% of wetlands, values 0 \u2013 141); wetlands with absence or near absence of human disturbances; zero to few stressors present; land use almost completely not human-created; equivalent to reference condition; conservation priority; 2 = lightly disturbed (2 - 5%, values 142 \u2013 703); wetland deviates from the minimally disturbed class based on existing landscape impacts; few stressors present; majority of land use is not human-created; these are the best wetlands in areas where some human impacts are present; ecosystem processes and functions are within natural ranges of variation found in the reference condition, but threats exist; usually reference condition; conservation priority; 3 = moderately disturbed (6 - 15%, values 704 \u2013 2,108); several stressors present; land use roughly split between human-created and non-human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are impaired and somewhat outside the range of variation found in the reference condition, but are still intact; ecosystem processes are restorable; sometimes the best remaining wetlands in watersheds with many human impacts; conservation and/or restoration priority; 4 = severely disturbed (16 - 40%, values 2,109 \u2013 5,625); numerous stressors present; land use is majority human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are severely altered or disrupted and outside the range of variation found in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are restorable, but may require large investments of energy and money to succeed; potential restoration priority; 5 = completely disturbed (bottom 41 - 100%, values 5,626 \u2013 14,055); many stressors present; land use is nearly completely human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are disrupted and outside the range of variation in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are very difficult or not feasible to restore. <\/SPAN><\/P>

Idaho\u2019s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool\u2014Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning<\/SPAN><\/A><\/P>

SUGGESTED CITATION<\/SPAN><\/P>

Murphy, C., J. Miller, and A. Schmidt. 2012. Idaho\u2019s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool\u2014Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning. Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Wetland Program Development Grant # CD96072201-0. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Bureau, Habitat Section and Wildlife Diversity Program, and Information Systems Bureau, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Information System. 53 pp. plus appendix<\/SPAN><\/P><\/DIV><\/DIV><\/DIV>", "copyrightText": "Idaho Fish and Game, EPA Wetland Program Development Grant # CD - 96072201-0", "supportsDynamicLayers": true, "layers": [ { "id": 0, "name": "Wetland Prioritization", "parentLayerId": -1, "defaultVisibility": false, "subLayerIds": null, "minScale": 0, "maxScale": 0, "type": "Feature Layer", "geometryType": "esriGeometryPolygon", "supportsDynamicLegends": true }, { "id": 1, "name": "Wetland Condition", "parentLayerId": -1, "defaultVisibility": false, "subLayerIds": null, "minScale": 0, "maxScale": 0, "type": "Raster Layer", "supportsDynamicLegends": true }, { "id": 2, "name": "Potential Wetland Riparian Occurrence", "parentLayerId": -1, "defaultVisibility": false, "subLayerIds": null, "minScale": 0, "maxScale": 0, "type": "Raster Layer", "supportsDynamicLegends": true } ], "tables": [], "spatialReference": { "wkid": 102100, "latestWkid": 3857, "xyTolerance": 0.001, "zTolerance": 2, "mTolerance": 2, "falseX": -20037700, "falseY": -30241100, "xyUnits": 1.4892314192838538E8, "falseZ": 0, "zUnits": 1, "falseM": -100000, "mUnits": 10000 }, "singleFusedMapCache": false, "initialExtent": { "xmin": -1.2267957566651655E7, "ymin": 5462475.191543539, "xmax": -1.2177194157212233E7, "ymax": 5540205.4254539525, "spatialReference": { "wkid": 102100, "latestWkid": 3857, "xyTolerance": 0.001, "zTolerance": 2, "mTolerance": 2, "falseX": -20037700, "falseY": -30241100, "xyUnits": 1.4892314192838538E8, "falseZ": 0, "zUnits": 1, "falseM": -100000, "mUnits": 10000 } }, "fullExtent": { "xmin": -1.3638919924801078E7, "ymin": 5010480.011843433, "xmax": -1.1762809924801078E7, "ymax": 6385740.011843433, "spatialReference": { "wkid": 102100, "latestWkid": 3857, "xyTolerance": 0.001, "zTolerance": 2, "mTolerance": 2, "falseX": -20037700, "falseY": -30241100, "xyUnits": 1.4892314192838538E8, "falseZ": 0, "zUnits": 1, "falseM": -100000, "mUnits": 10000 } }, "datesInUnknownTimezone": false, "minScale": 0, "maxScale": 0, "units": "esriMeters", "supportedImageFormatTypes": "PNG32,PNG24,PNG,JPG,DIB,TIFF,EMF,PS,PDF,GIF,SVG,SVGZ,BMP", "documentInfo": { "Title": "Wetland Condition and Occurrence", "Author": "", "Comments": "

Idaho wetland condition ranking based on classification of finwetlandwt1 layer into 5 categories: 1 = minimally disturbed (top 1% of wetlands, values 0 \u2013 141); wetlands with absence or near absence of human disturbances; zero to few stressors present; land use almost completely not human-created; equivalent to reference condition; conservation priority; 2 = lightly disturbed (2 - 5%, values 142 \u2013 703); wetland deviates from the minimally disturbed class based on existing landscape impacts; few stressors present; majority of land use is not human-created; these are the best wetlands in areas where some human impacts are present; ecosystem processes and functions are within natural ranges of variation found in the reference condition, but threats exist; usually reference condition; conservation priority; 3 = moderately disturbed (6 - 15%, values 704 \u2013 2,108); several stressors present; land use roughly split between human-created and non-human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are impaired and somewhat outside the range of variation found in the reference condition, but are still intact; ecosystem processes are restorable; sometimes the best remaining wetlands in watersheds with many human impacts; conservation and/or restoration priority; 4 = severely disturbed (16 - 40%, values 2,109 \u2013 5,625); numerous stressors present; land use is majority human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are severely altered or disrupted and outside the range of variation found in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are restorable, but may require large investments of energy and money to succeed; potential restoration priority; 5 = completely disturbed (bottom 41 - 100%, values 5,626 \u2013 14,055); many stressors present; land use is nearly completely human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are disrupted and outside the range of variation in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are very difficult or not feasible to restore. <\/SPAN><\/P>

Idaho\u2019s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool\u2014Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning<\/SPAN><\/A><\/P>

SUGGESTED CITATION<\/SPAN><\/P>

Murphy, C., J. Miller, and A. Schmidt. 2012. Idaho\u2019s landscape-scale wetland condition assessment tool\u2014Methods and applications in conservation and restoration planning. Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Wetland Program Development Grant # CD96072201-0. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Bureau, Habitat Section and Wildlife Diversity Program, and Information Systems Bureau, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Information System. 53 pp. plus appendix<\/SPAN><\/P><\/DIV><\/DIV><\/DIV>", "Subject": "Contains conservation site and wetland inventory project layers with wetland prioritization, condition, and potential occurrence.", "Category": "", "Version": "2.9.0", "AntialiasingMode": "Fast", "TextAntialiasingMode": "Force", "Keywords": "idfg,wetland,conservation,prioritization" }, "supportsQueryDomains": true, "capabilities": "Map,Query,Data", "supportedQueryFormats": "JSON, geoJSON, PBF", "exportTilesAllowed": false, "referenceScale": 0.0, "supportsDatumTransformation": true, "floorAwareMapProperties": { "defaultFloorFilterSettings": {"isEnabled": true} }, "archivingInfo": {"supportsHistoricMoment": false}, "supportsClipping": true, "supportsSpatialFilter": true, "supportsTimeRelation": true, "supportsQueryDataElements": true, "mapUnits": {"uwkid": 9001}, "maxRecordCount": 2000, "maxImageHeight": 4096, "maxImageWidth": 4096, "supportedExtensions": "", "resampling": false, "serviceItemId": "2a7d2cdeda92435c817fe2dc3ff5ed58" }